Archive for the ‘cetis-standards’ Category

Hammer time?

Sunday, January 18th, 2009

Every time I see the CRIG logo I find myself thinking perhaps they should stop hammering away and look at the other faces of the cube where they might find a round hole.

The CRIG hammers a round block into a square hole

ISO Metadata for Learning Resources

Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

As I write there is a meeting near Paris where the future direction of the proposed ISO Standard on Metadata for Learning Resources is being discussed. CETIS were asked to contribute to this meeting, and Lorna and I have done so through a position statement circulated to the delegates. In this post I’ll give some background to that position paper and to ISO MLR itself.
(more…)

OAI-ORE European Rollout

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

Last week I went to Southampton for the European rollout of the OAI-ORE specification (now in alpha version 0.3). If you need a quick catch-up on what ORE (Object Reuse and Exchange) is about, try this article and presentation from last summer. Here’s a tidied-up mind-map of what I gathered from Southampton:
(more…)

Progress with OAI-ORE?

Friday, November 2nd, 2007

There seems to be some progress towards an implementable draft spec for OAI-ORE. Perhaps the best available description of what the ORE (Object Reuse and Exchange) spec is trying achieve is an article published by Herbert Van de Sompel and Carl Lagoze, which comes with a screencastdemonstration of a prototype system. It will be interesting when the full details of ORE are available to compare it to the IMS Content Packaging approach to reuse and exchange. ORE seems to benefit from being thoroughly in tune with and building on the web architecture. Is there anything important that IMS CP supports that ORE doesn’t? For example, is it possible in ORE to define how the contents are to be organized or structured? It’s not really possible to say much more without actually seeing a draft of the actual spec, and those are being kept secret. It seems that details will not be available until an open meeting on March 3rd to launch the first beta release [update: I was mistaken, the alpha spec was released in December, see Pete's comment below]. Earlier versions of the spec exist, but are not available to anyone outside the ORE team, a situation I find curious and frustrating.