4 thoughts on “Comparing metadata requirements for OERs (part 3)

  1. I’ll note as a commment rather than as part of the text – this post feels incomplete to me, though I suspect a large part of this feeling maybe becasue I want to include the answers to questions that we, as a programme, are only begining to ask. I guess we’ll see were we’ve got to in April.

  2. Pingback: Twitted by ukoer

  3. A couple of thoughts. I can’t really see any easy way of reconciling application specific usage data with the idea of a canonical structured metadata record. Especially given that ukoer materials will be scattered across multiple applications. This is definitely getting into tracking. You’re right that a detailed investigation of tracking issues is a bit out of scope for us right now but we definitely want to capture those tracking issues that the programme surfaces.

    Using OAI-ORE to associate distributed annotations is a very interesting idea. Definitely worth further exploration I would have thought.

  4. Pingback: Phil’s JISC CETIS blog» Blog Archive » About metadata & resource description (pt 1)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>