8 thoughts on “Comparing metadata requirements for OERs (part 2)

  1. Pingback: Twitted by ambrouk

  2. Pingback: John’s JISC CETIS blog » Comparing metadata requirements for OERs (part 3)

  3. Seems to me that with modern search technology all of this meta is redundant, making your content easy to find by anyone based on what you actually put on the page, rather than hidden meta that may or may not represent the page content.

    Is this not just a heavyweight solution to a non-problem?

    • @Peter That’s an interesting point. One of the issues we’re looking at in the development programme is how to improve the search engine visibility of OERs and this is a key issue for any resource. However, the metadata remains very important for a number of reasons, briefly:
      1) the resources are also likely to be made available through specific applications which use the metadata to support refined and (more) precise searching as well as being likely to be used for the local management of resources
      2) not all the resources in question are text or have related text
      3) such metadata provides a step toward a web of linked data and may be sueful when considered limited sections of the web (searches within defined domains)
      4) the information in question is used by aggregation services (of which there are already several for OERs)
      I’m sure we’ll come back to this throughout the programme

  4. Pingback: Phil’s JISC CETIS blog» Blog Archive » About metadata & resource description (pt 1)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>